Petition to make Haldane Bridge safer submitted to Newcastle Council

SPACE for Jesmond have submitted a petition to Newcastle City Council signed by over 180 people who support the currently-shelved closure of Haldane Road bridge, which was to make the streets safer for local residents and those walking and cycling through the area.

SPACE for Jesmond members submit petition to Newcastle City Council

The bridge, situated in South Jesmond ward and linking Osborne Road to existing cycling and walking routes, was to be closed to motor traffic in order form a key cycling route through Jesmond. The area is the location for two large private schools and a route to West Jesmond Primary. The narrow bridge is heavily used as a rat-run for drivers wishing to avoid traffic lights and vehicles regularly mount the pavement while congestion is caused due to high levels of school run traffic heading in opposite directions. It is also a key route for those cycling into the city and those who walk to the schools.

As previously reported in the Chronicle, the council engineers’ closure plan, part of a £1 million programme of improvement in Jesmond, has been shelved by local councillors who are reluctant to impact on residents in the area, fearing a shift in motor traffic to adjacent streets.

Our petition shows that there is actually a strong level of support from residents in the immediate vicinity to close this bridge to motor traffic; over 50 signatures were received from residents living close to the bridge during our door-knocking campaign.

SPACE for Jesmond’s position is that the council should not renege on their their commitments to increase cycling and make residential streets safer. The council have bid for and received a substantial pot of funding from central government on the basis that they will support people to travel sustainably and make streets safer and more pleasant. It makes little sense to on the one hand commit to reduce car dependency and on the other to say that those commitments will not be put into action because they must facilitate drivers.

Petition signatory Martin Edney highlights the root of the issue:

“The key to this is the school run. The worst problems in this area are around school start and end times, and there are several schools in the area. If we can get the schools to work with parents to reduce school run traffic through these narrow residential streets, it will improve things for vulnerable road users. It should be a no-brainer, since many of those vulnerable road users are also on their way to and from those schools.”

We completely agree. They key here is to reduce the traffic in the area by directly addressing the real issue – large numbers of children being driven to and from the school gates – and providing safe walking and cycling routes are a key part of making that reduction.

 


An Open Letter to Jesmond Councillors

Dear Councillor,

SPACE for Jesmond is an informal group of Jesmond residents trying to make our home a better, safer place for those who want a liveable neighbourhood and wish to travel sustainably on foot or by bicycle. Many of us have been part of the local reference group for “Streets for People” which is part of the UK Government’s “Cycle City Ambition” programme of funding. This reference group has been active for three years, and we have given many hours of our time to help shape the £1 million investment being made in Jesmond to enable walking and cycling.

The rationale behind this programme of investment is quite clear; as a society we must change the way we travel in order to reduce congestion, reduce inactivity, improve air quality and tackle climate change. Action must be taken at a local authority and ward level to effect this change – because local changes lead to national and global ones.

In November 2018, the reference group met in Northumbria University to view detailed plans from council engineers. We were rewarded with ambitious but achievable plans costed at a little over £1 million. SPACE for Jesmond agreed that the proposals would make a real difference to cycling and walking in Jesmond. On 10th November 2018, we wrote to the Community Engagement Officer at Newcastle City Council and said:

The officers have been ambitious and provided a cohesive set of schemes for the area, and we can see how these can be linked and expanded in the future. We feel they are a real step in the right direction for Jesmond, and strongly support the direction taken in the council’s plans. It is now up to the council to have the political will to see these designs, or designs which are similarly oriented, through to completion.”

The engagement officer emailed us on the 17th January 2019 with an update regarding Streets for People. In it, the shortlisted scheme list has been changed with several impactful designs completely removed and other schemes – previously ruled out by officers – replacing them on the list.

Objections:

We object to the current situation on the following grounds:

A) This decision to re-prioritise schemes has been made behind closed doors and has not involved the reference group, which it was supposed to.

The Streets for People briefing note, dated 07/01/2016, states:

“The Reference Group, with the advice and support of Technical Officers from the council, will work through the neighbourhood map and prioritise the findings”

We find this change to decision making – and lack of transparency – extremely concerning and not in keeping with the process specified by council officers, who assured us on numerous occasions that this would not happen and that this was going to be an exemplary bottom-up participatory exercise.

B) The schemes that would contribute most to cycling and walking have been removed.

A decision has been made to drop the proposed extension of Strategic Route 4 on Eslington Terrace onto Osborne road (via a modal filter on Haldane bridge). This was identified as being a key East-West route for cycling in the city during the process of developing the plans, enabling journeys into town and to Heaton and High Heaton. A decision also appears to have been made to drop improvements to Tankerville Terrace which would increase safety outside the schools and improve the streets cyclability. This is the second time that plans have been drawn up and community engagement conducted in relation to Tankerville Terrace and this is the second time that plans have been dropped without explanation.

These 2 schemes in particular are aligned with the “three stage journey” set out in the council’s “Newcastle, fit for cycling” funding bid:

  1. “Embedding cycling as a choice that people feel safe and able to make within their local areas”
  2. “Incorporating the route to work by improving the quality of strategic routes to Newcastle City Centre”

The bid also states:

“Jesmond…have been designated as potential community cycling areas. These are residential areas with established 20mph zones where rat-running, uncontrolled parking and lack of pedestrian and cycle priority for crossing make the streets feel unfriendly”

And in the initial funding application (2013) Cllr Joyce McCarty writes:

“We are ambitious. Our vision is to achieve a 12% cycle mode share for trip under 5 miles”

The de-prioritisation of these schemes is therefore not in line with the proposals submitted to the Department for Transport. They suggest that the council are anything but ambitious and do not intend to honour their original commitment to improving cycling provision in Jesmond.

C) This change does not appear to make full use of the £1 million assigned to Jesmond.

A promise was made to all three Streets for People areas that they would receive roughly (as close as possible) similar funding. The schemes proposed in November 2018 included cycle lanes on Osborne Road and Tankerville Terrace and were costed at a little over £1 million. These have not been replaced with schemes of equivalent value. We have been informed that the proposed schemes will only cost just over £500,000. Where is the rest of the funding?

Our Requests:

We request that the minutes of the meeting where this shortlist was changed are made public.

We would like to know:

  • Who has decided to cancel schemes which would support cycling?
  • On what basis did they cancel those schemes?
  • How can these changes be justified in light of the council’s own targets as set out in the funding application for Cycle City Ambition?

We believe that it is not in the public interest to withhold schemes on which a great deal of time and money has been spent. It is difficult to understand why councillors were happy for these schemes to be progressed to this point if they do not intend to follow through with them. Local councillors may feel that they have the best interests of residents at heart, however they are denying residents the opportunity to judge the plans for themselves.

We do not believe that the council’s of aim of 12% cycling mode share for journeys under 5 miles can possibly be met when the council itself is sabotaging that goal. It is time that the council stood by its commitments and delivered the changes needed to make Newcastle fit for cycling.

Yours Faithfully,

Ed Smith

On behalf of SPACE for Jesmond


Air Quality around West Jesmond Primary School – Autumn 2018

The area around West Jesmond Primary School is very busy with traffic from the three schools on Tankerville terrace, which SPACEforJesmond believe should be a priority for our community to address. High levels of traffic around the schools – some from within Jesmond and as little as 300 metres away – create an unsafe and polluted environment for our children.

In order to quantify pollution levels, last winter SPACEforJesmond used a portable air quality monitor to sample the air around Jesmond, primarily on the school run and around West Jesmond Primary school. This revealed “hotspots” of pollution in areas where it might be expected, such as Osborne Road and Tankerville Terrace. The portable air quality monitor measured particulate matter (PM) of various sizes, all of which have a detrimental effect on our health. The monitor did not however measure Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) which is the focus of much attention at the moment due its harmful effects, especially on children, who are still developing physically. NO2, a bi-product of diesel combustion, has an impact on respiratory health and development and has been indicated as a cause of obesity in children.

The air quality monitor is mounted on a lamp-post and solar powered

Thanks to the Urban Observatory, a lamp-post mounted air quality monitor was installed outside West Jesmond Primary School for the start of the new school year. This sensor measures, amongst other things, Nitrogen Dioxide (not to be confused with Nitrous Oxide, a.k.a. laughing gas).

Urban Observatory air pollution monitor outside West Jesmond Primary School, Jesmond

 

Results

The results from the first school term highlight the impact of the morning school run. The peak value on a weekday occurs between 8am-9am, when the level of pollution doubles (44ug/m3) compared to the background levels in the middle of the night. The levels rise less dramatically for the afternoon run, presumably due to the mix of after-school clubs and different approaches to picking children up at the end of the day.

 

West Jesmond Primary Hourly mean, NO2 ug/m3, weekdays only during the first half of the 2018 autumn term

What’s really interesting to note is that, on weekdays, the area around West Jesmond Primary is almost as polluted as the A1058 Coast Road. The daily mean value for the Coast Road NO2 during this period was 31.5ug/m3 (measured at the Cradlewell Urban Observatory high precision air monitor). The value for the sensor at WJPS was 30.2ug/m3.

So, what does this mean? It’s important to note that there is nothing illegal about these levels of pollution – the monitor outside WJPS is not a legally designated site, and the annual mean limit set by the EU is 40ug/m3. After a year’s worth of monitoring, it will be possible to compare these levels against the legal limits.

Despite this, the data indicates that the morning rush around Tankerville Terrace effectively doubles the pollution levels and that for the first school term, weekday pollution here was similar to the A1058 at Cradlewell, which is the location of a DEFRA network station, the measurements of which are close to breaking the legal annual limit on NO2, and have done in previous years.

Diesel combustion is also temperature sensitive and many of the pollution removing features are turned off in cold weather and this is true whether the vehicle is moving or idling. It is common to see people idling for periods of time outside the school – likely to keep the heater working – and this produces pollution too. A colder spell could really increase pollution in the area and SPACEforJesmond will continue to monitor this site.

Our view

In our view it’s vital that councillors and council officers take action to protect children on the school run by reducing polluting traffic and enabling walking and cycling to school. Children who are driven, some from very close by, are receiving a double-dose of negative health impacts through inactivity and exposure to pollutants. This is being already addressed in schemes elsewhere in the UK – such as Hackney School Streets and Edinburgh School Streets – and Newcastle should follow their lead, as a UNICEF child friendly city, to do what is right for children in Jesmond.


Campaigning by a Councillor? It can happen!

by Tony Waterston

25/04/2018

In Newcastle, it is unusual for governing party councillors to speak out loudly on a topic not approved by the council. There seems to be a fear that if some residents don’t approve, it is better to take action behind the scenes. So I was pleased that a Labour councillor in St Andrews – where I have started a vibrant cycle campaign – went to the press to fly a balloon in favour of pedestrianisation – which is not (as yet) supported by the Council.

St Andrews is a beautiful and ancient city which is being ruined by motor traffic. The three central streets are choc a bloc with cars and there are no cycle lanes in the centre, and precious little cycle parking – (see picture below)

Trying to cross Market Street

An expensive re-make made the central street, Market St, one way in 2010 with widened pavements and old style cobbles, but no cycle contraflow and lots of idling and offensive exhaust fumes. Pedestrianisation was considered at that time but was heavily opposed by the Merchants’ Association for the usual reasons. St Andrews Space for Cycling (SASC) would like to make the whole central area car free and to soften people up, we are pressing for a car free day in the autumn. Our member and councillor Brian decided there is enough support for a change and put out a press release (without council discussion) calling for pedestrianisation and asking residents to write to him with their views.

This was put on the front page of the Courier (regional paper) and Citizen (local paper) and was the subject of a feature article in the latter.

And the feedback? Lots of criticism on Facebook, but the messages received by the Councillor were 80% in favour.

.. and now, there is a momentum. Local students have offered to lead a feasibility study and Cycling Scotland will help. The council can hardly hold back if there is pressure from the public for walking and cycling spaces.

Could this happen in Newcastle? Let’s ask the new councillors after the election: for a start, a traffic free school run to West Jesmond School!


City Council Elections 2018

There are elections for the Council happening in Newcastle on the 3rdMay 2018. This year new ward boundaries are being introduced, and Jesmond residents have three votes to elect candidates in their ward.

With lots of new faces we’re keen to find out what the candidates think, in particular about how they plan to address transport-related issues in our community. To do that we’ve come up with five statements or pledges and we have asked each of the candidates whether they support these or if not what they plan to do instead.

Below the candidate’s responses, which we’ll update as they are received, we have also written a bit of background about why we have chosen these particular statements.

Please keep checking back in advance of the elections on 3 May and if one of your candidates has not yet answered please do encourage them to do so. The very least we should expect from future local councillors is a willingness to engage with local residents and share their vision for the future of Jesmond.

THE SPACE FOR JESMOND PLEDGES

The five pledges we have asked candidates to support are:

  1. Streets that are safe (and feel safe) for children to walk and cycle to school, to the shops or to the park.
  2. Air pollution in Newcastle brought within legal limits as soon as possible.
  3. Residential streets that are pleasant, safe and attractive places to live and where children can play out.
  4. Rapid implementation of temporary changes to trial interventions to support these objectives.
  5. Constructive community engagement about how to address the public health impacts of travel and the benefits of active travel.

Please see below for more on why we have chosen these pledges and what they mean in practice.

We are contacting all the candidates and will post their responses below when we receive them. The candidates are listed in the order they appear on the Statement of Persons Nominated on the City Council website

NORTH JESMOND WARD

Name Party Response
James Bartle  Conservative Party
David Besag  Liberal Democrats  Partial Support
James Cowling  Conservative Party
Alexander Hay  Labour Party  Support
Gerry Keating  Liberal Democrats Partial Support
Kitty Lau  Conservative Party
Shehla Naqvi  Green Party  Support
Stella Postlethwaite  Labour Party  Support
Crispin Welby  Liberal Democrats  Partial Support
Wendy Young  Labour Party  Support

SOUTH JESMOND WARD

Name Party Response
Arlene Ainsley Labour Party  Support
Clare Andrews Green Party  Support
Deborah Burns Liberal Democrats
Max Graham Conservative Party
Mark Keville Liberal Democrats
Martin Levy Communist Party of Britain  Support
Alexandra Logan Liberal Democrats
Ian MacGlip Conservative Party
Felicity Mendelson Labour Party  Support
Christopher Murray Conservative Party
Judy Pearce Labour Party  Support
Tony Waterston Green Party  Support

WHY HAVE WE CHOSEN THESE PLEDGES?

Pledge 1. Streets that are safe, and feel safe, for children to walk and cycle to school, to the shops or to the park.

Everyone should be able to travel safely whether they walk, cycle, use public transport or drive and should feel safe while they do so, but this isn’t currently the case in Jesmond. Often, traffic is fast and it isn’t always easy to see due to the high level of kerbside parking and high sided vehicles.

Children are less able to look out for themselves and are more likely to be injured or even killed in the event of a collision, so focusing on children, whether travelling independently or with an adult, is a good way to make Jesmond safer for everyone.

Children are also more vulnerable to air pollution and children driven to school can be subject to up to ten times worse air quality than children who walk or cycle, and the extra vehicles make it harder for everyone else who needs to drive. Children who walk or cycle also get the benefit of the exercise – with the NHS recommending that children need at least 60 minute of moderate or vigorous exercise every day.

When we say streets ‘that are safe and feel safe’ we mean streets where children can and do walk and cycle to school, to shops or to the park, and where parents feel comfortable to let them. Ultimately it will be for local residents, and in particular parents, to judge whether a street is safe for their children to walk and cycle. We hope to work with Councillors who sign up to this pledge to engage with local parents to determine what is needed to achieve this objective.

While it is right that children are the priority, the map below shows the locations of where people have been killed or seriously injured in the Jesmond area in the last 10 years (2008-2017). As with other UK cities including Liverpool and Edinburgh we hope Newcastle will also adopt a “Vision Zero” target i.e. zero deaths or serious injuries on Newcastle’s roads.

Crash-map showing locations of  people killed or seriously injured in the Jesmond area of Newcastle 2008-2017

Pledge 2. Air pollution in Newcastle brought within legal limits as soon as possible.

In the last official figures from 2016, both Gosforth and City Centre Air Quality Management Areas (which stretches along Jesmond Road to Heaton) were in breach of the legal limits that should have been met by 2010. Bringing air pollution within legal limits as soon as possible is actually a legal requirement and Newcastle City Council has been mandated by DEFRA to produce a plan to do this by the end of 2018. Our expectation is that legal limits in Newcastle can be achieved by 2020 however that will depend on the detailed modelling currently being undertaken by the Council.

Air pollution affects everyone but it affects the young and the old the most. In Newcastle it has been estimated that 124 lives are lost every year as a result of illegal air pollution just for nitrogen dioxide with particulate matter likely to be responsible for more still. As well as causing early deaths, air pollution is also known to be a major cause of heart disease, lung disease, cancer and has been shown to be responsible for birth defects and cognitive delay in children.

In a recent report, the Royal College of Physicians has recommended that to protect public health, the UK adopt even more ambitious targets than the current legal limits and we hope Newcastle will adopt and work towards meeting those more challenging targets.

Given this is a legal requirement that the Council must meet we expect all candidates will sign up to this pledge.

Pledge 3. Residential streets that are pleasant, safe and attractive places to live and where children can play out without fear of traffic.

Streets aren’t just about movement of traffic. They are also where we live, shop and socialise, and for children also where they are most likely to play outside near their homes.

Some streets in Jesmond are suitable for children to play out but many are not. Jesmond is permeable to motor traffic wishing to avoid the Coast Road (A1058 Jesmond Road) and since the closure of Jesmond Dene Road rat-running occurs through residential streets. Similarly, Osborne Road – a residential street – is used as a “relief valve” for traffic on the Great North Road, despite electoral candidates for Jesmond agreeing in 2014 that Osborne Road should be for access only.

As a result we don’t see as many children playing out as we might expect and certainly a lot fewer than we when were children ourselves. Parents cannot be blamed for keeping their children indoors with such high volumes of traffic.

Low-traffic neighbourhoods with streets that are safe for children are better for everyone with less noise, less danger and cleaner air.  It’s even been shown that people living on streets with less traffic have more friends and a better social life than those that live on streets with heavy traffic. This is no laughing matter when loneliness is now considered such a serious issue that the Government has appointed a Minister for Loneliness to create a national loneliness strategy.

As with pledge 1, it will be for local residents to judge whether a street is pleasant, safe and attractive and where children can play out without fear of traffic. We hope to work with Councillors who sign up to this pledge to engage with local residents who have concerns about  traffic-related issues to look at options for how this objective can be met for their street.

Pledge 4. Rapid implementation of temporary changes to trial interventions in support of these objectives.

If Pledges 1-3 are to mean anything there must be some meaningful and urgent action as a result. Often changes involving traffic are controversial with long and heated debates about the likely consequences of a change. Yet other cities have shown that there is a different way, with trial interventions that can be implemented quickly that let people experience what will happen without any permanent commitment being made.

Using trials as part of a range of interventions helps inform the debate as people can see the benefits for themselves, and if there are issues with the trial then they can be stated factually with councillors and residents then able to work together to resolve or mitigate those issues.

Clearly not all issues can be resolved straight away but we hope to work with Councillors and other members of the community to identify and prioritise the areas of greatest concern, where trials might receive the most support and have the greatest benefit.

Pledge 5. Constructive community engagement about how to address the public health impacts of travel and the benefits of active travel.

Making streets safer and cutting air pollution should be objectives that everyone supports, but it is still important that the council and local councillors engage with the community to ensure that residents understand what the issues are and have a chance to help solve those issues. Air pollution in particular is invisible and we’ve found that many people haven’t been aware that it has been, and continues to be, a problem in Jesmond. Nor are people generally aware of the very serious health impact of sedentary lifestyles which cost taxpayers billions of pounds every year and are responsible for even more early deaths than air pollution.

Likewise it is often challenging to put ourselves in others’ shoes, to understand for example what it is like to be a child on Jesmond’s streets, what it is like to be a parent cycling or walking with children (or even alone) on busy streets during the rush hour, or what it is like for residents or visitors with disabilities or conditions for whom travel is a challenge. It is only by having this broad engagement that we can ensure that Jesmond’s streets are safe and accessible for everyone.

These five pledges are based on SPACE for Jesmond’s objectives* which you can see on our home page. We welcome input from candidates about how they will go about meeting other aspects of those objectives to make streets in Jesmond more healthy, liveable, accessible and safe for everyone of all ages and abilities.

Our thanks go to our neighbouring group, SPACE for Gosforth, in helping to put this information together.

*Please note that at the time of writing our objectives are temporary and may be further refined to reflect Jesmond’s specific needs.


Ministers Urged to Support Active School Travel

In an open letter to UK Transport Ministers, a group of health and transport specialists have urged Ministers to ditch a “windscreen perspective” and reverse a 42-year decline in children’s mobility.

Writing in the BMJ, the authors note:

“The rhetoric of improving the environment in favour of children’s active travel has been visible for at least two decades but tangible changes have largely been absent from transport planning. We suggest that the time is right to redress the imbalance and give back to today’s children many of the freedoms that older adults recall and benefited from in terms of the levels of independent mobility.”

Highlighting increased car use on the school run – almost half of primary pupils are now driven – the authors suggest 10% of national infrastructure budgets be put toward better routes for walking and cycling, because the “default choice” of car travel is damaging children’s health, not just through inactivity, but also because air pollution becomes concentrated inside vehicles.

Of course, it isn’t just a matter of children’s independence and health. The authors highlight the wider benefits to physical and mental health, the public purse and improvements in air quality and travel time that would result from a sensible level of investment in active travel.

With Transport Scotland doubling their investment in active travel, it would be great to think that the rest of the UK will follow suit, especially considering the myriad benefits which come from reduced reliance on motor cars. However, while we puzzle over the lack of investment from Westminster, we need to consider; what can be done right here and now in Jesmond?

After all, we don’t want our kids to end up like Alex.

Too much traffic, so we drive!


Monitoring Air Quality in Jesmond

Air Quality is an issue which has been getting a lot of press recently. On the back of the Volkswagen scandal there has been increased public scrutiny of what is coming out of the tailpipe of motor vehicles. However, while there is a focus from certain sectors on cleaner, greener cars there are many journeys which we can make on foot or bike instead, with all the well documented benefits this brings. Providing local evidence of pollution levels can help make the case for prioritising walking and cycling in Jesmond, but this is not possible to do without specialist equipment…

To try and quantify pollution in Jesmond, SPACEforJesmond have taken the opportunity to work with Sense My Street, a project run by Aare Puussaar at Newcastle University’s Open Lab.

I spent December 2017 walking around Jesmond with a Fidas Frog portable Air Quality monitor and a GPS tracker, to find out what the Air Quality is like in Jesmond, and importantly, how this changes in particular streets, especially at busy times. An area of focus was West Jesmond Primary School on Tankerville Terrace, around school run time. Tankerville Terrace is often very busy and at some times, a complete standstill. There are often idling vehicles which become backed up along the length of the street.

While Petrol and Diesel vehicles produce pollutants of varying types, the Frog measures particulate matter (PM) – very fine dust which is emitted as a by-product of diesel combustion among other things.

The results are now available, and very interesting.

Note: The colour gradient does not indicate anything dangerous or illegal about the measurement. The World Health Organisation do not have a “safe limit” for PM exposure and EU legal levels are not measured using the method employed here.

It is possible to see various “hotspots” on the map. These are:

  • Tankerville Terrace near West Jesmond Primary School
  • Sections of Osborne Road
  • Adjacent to the Royal Grammar School
  • Sandyford road adjacent Civic Centre

To get a fuller picture of PM levels in Jesmond would require more intensive monitoring, but as an indicator of the exposure I have as a commuter on the school run, it seems that the further away from the traffic I am, the lower my exposure – which is exactly what we would expect. So, to lower my exposure, I can try and avoid the main roads.

However, two of the “hotspots” are around schools, and there’s no way that children can avoid these areas. The only way to improve the air quality is to reduce the amount of motor traffic near the school, and to do that, we need to shift more journeys to walking, scooting, cycling and public transport.